fifteen years ago. The PHD option is doing research on tall days. I swimmered with many articles, annexures, emails, bookmarks, etc. It was like that I was able to control the process again. When I received a Bookmark manager, Xbookmark, I felt very productive (I have Bookmarks). They worked well at the time, and I finished my PhD program and got my degree.
Episode 1 – Coping With Reality
These days, I have a problem. I can see how the AI research tools are advanced. I was working with Scinito another day, and I was shocked. I was trying to persuade them that this is the only tool to help in the review of book reviews. Those who made a PhD know how difficult it is to make a solid book update. It's not a joke. You should read more than 100 articles, divide, understand, setting himself up. If I say it has taken 3-6 months to make strong book reviews 15 years ago, I was not bad. I heard me right, 3-6 months of your important life.
At first, I tried to persuade my Scnito, or other similar tools, give the sidewalk to researchers. Sadly, or happily, I was wrong …
Not only can they be reviews in a minute (sorry, a magnificent, well-felt), but they can review your articles. I will never forget how I should have been waiting for my advisers and advisors to review my article, how many emails go back despite them and found them for acceptable quality. Even after these efforts, you get a broad answer from the jurnnal commentator to look at your article to be published. Or, be rejected after 3 or 6 months due to selecting the wrong journal to publish. These Assistance of AI assistance can highlight all these steps: Reviewing your articles and selecting the most appropriate journal on you.
It's amazing. It is very amazing in the investigators in this period, but I feel sad to see how long I spend a lot easier and easier. An exciting part is that this is not the end of the season. It's just the beginning.
This challenge is not just researchers; Related to Software Developers. Tools such as cursor Ide change how much software is built. After my PhD, I started my job of engineering. So, I made many codes, to test and so. Today, I don't need to study the stack of abundance to fix my code. I don't need to spend the punctuation test for my code. I no longer need to be a specialist, HTML, or CSS to create a website. How long have I used in creating sites in the past? I don't want to think about it!
SECTION 2 – Accept the Truth
Let me share a complete part of the glass experience. This is very cool. I can ask AI assistant assistance tools to perform a semantic search within a broader data. Something that doesn't happen before. It was the same as the keyword. I can receive updates about any articles or research questions for hours by reading a book updated by AI in seconds. I can write the latex code easily. I can turn my paper in any directory in minutes. I am happy by our time researchers. They can spend more time wisely, solving problems, and, their health rather than unnecessary tasks.
I'm happy with me. I can write the code in any form of programs I want. I can build websites without closing in Wix or WordPress. I can write any Python code I need. I can fix it and write a series of its tests. Wow! It is very cool. Codeting areas, design, research, and everything is immediately evident. No matter how many people or organizations are resistant, technology will find the way.
There is catching here. The promise to create a website with one stream (and only one) incorrect. I tell this based on current experiences. These days, I work on the new website with your colleagues, both specialists in Software and AI. We never think of Wix or WordPress in this case. We started using the curosr and its agent experience with Claude-3.7-Sonnet. Cursor agent can produce a website structure for a second, but fails when it comes to details.
For example, when you want to synchronize the two different texts, especially when one of them is static and one of them strong, AI cannot do well. Basically, AI can make a website structure per second, but cannot make the necessary information (the information you want to use as a person above the premises) and UI design specialists. That means, even if we do not need specialists to respond to or CSS, we must know the foundations in the code code where required. Also, we should know your concepts to explain. If you can't say, AI cannot do it!
I am not shocked about this weakness of ai model. Formed by “the wisdom of the crowds” crowds.
The last words
I have been lucky to be part of a ai community. I am a ai builder with a solid plan to compose this technical change. But I'm worried about many people who can't handle this change. This is not at all. If you've been a minute that is available in your work because of AI, let me know. I might know something to help.
If I could share one tip here, it can 'read the foundations, deeply.' You can (should) leave repeated, high, and generic functions in AI, and use your human intelligence and technology in detail / your product and shine.
Follow me on YouTube if you want to hear a lot of news from the Ai Architectect: YouTube.com/aiuUounthodox –
