ANI

AI is still in understanding of social worker

Summary: The immigrants of AI have moved to the stronger public interactions, an important skill problem as independent vehicles and helping. In a new study, the reliability participants judge short video scenes, while more than 350 models have strive to match the accuracy of the human or predict brain responses.

Language models travel better by guessing one's interpretation, while video models were better for predicting the brain work, but there are no similar people. The investigators believe that the gap is from the current breach after special brain in static images, facilitating the dynamic energy needed in understanding real health.

Key facts:

  • Personal Height: People failed 350+ models in AI to describe video clips.
  • Model limitations: No AI model is well likened both human judgments and brain responses.
  • Cause: AI may dispose of essential methods of brain-inspired brain of processing powerful scenes.

Source: Jhu

People, it appears, better than the current AI model in explaining and collecting community communication in a dynamic area – the skill required in future vehicles, units of assistance, and other technologies.

Research, led by scientists in John Hopsity, you find that artificial technical programs fail to understand the power of the public and the context needed to participate with AI program infrastructure.

The results provide a sharp contrast to AI's success in reading images and still, says investigators. Credit: Neuroscience news

“A, for example, will have to identify the goals, objectives and acts of pedestrians.

“You may want you to know which walking way is about to walk, or that two people in the opposition is to cross the road,” says auxiliary professor of Science in John Hopkins University.

“Any time you want AI to communicate with people, you want them to be able to see what people do. I think this is clear that these programs are not currently able.”

Kathy Garcia, the student of the Siki's laboratory medicines during the Author of the research author, will submit the findings of the international conference by April 24.

Deciding how AI models combine compared to human understanding, researchers requesting three secondary participants to view the second two videoclips and important measurements to understand social interactions on a scale of a specific to five.

The clips include individuals who are contacting each other, doing side tasks, or performing independent tasks.

The investigators then asked over 350 languages ​​Ai language, video models to predict how people will judge videos and how their brain will react to the view. Great models of language, investigators had an AIS to check shorts, human articles.

Participants, many of the many, agree with each of the questions; AI models, regardless of the size or information they are trained, did not. Video models could not explain what people were doing in the videos.

Even the picture models provided by a series of frames that will be able to comment does not be reliable if people communicated. Language models were better for predicting human behavior, and video models are better for predicting neural work in the brain.

The results provide a sharp contrast to AI's success in reading images and still, says investigators.

“It is not enough to see the picture and notice things and face. That was the first step, which was a long way in Ai. But real health is a way to understand the story.

“Understanding relationships, the context, and the power of public cooperation is the following step, and the study shows that it may be a blind place in Ai Model Development,” Garcia said.

Studies believe that this is because Ai neural networks are inspired by the brain infrastructure processing strong, unique in the brain area that processes strong social scenes.

“There are many birds, but the Big Takeaway is not ai models that can match the brain answers to people and behaviors in the markets across the board,” said Sik.

“I think there is a basic basis for how people process these missing types.”

About this AI and social research lesson

The author: Hanna Robbins
Source: Jhu
Contact: Hanna Robbins – JHu
Image: This picture is placed in neuroscience matters

Real Survey: The findings will be introduced at international conference in study

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button